COMMISSION BRINGS COPYRIGHT ACTIONS AGAINST FIVE MEMBER STATES


The European Commission announced today that it is referring Italy and Luxembourg to the ECJ for failing to implement the 1992 EC Directive on rental right and on certain rights related to copyright properly into their legislation. Both Italy and Luxembourg do not pay authors when their works are lent out by public libraries, even though this is required of them by the Directive. The Commission has also decided to launch infringement proceedings against Belgium, Finland and Sweden because those countries have not complied with the 2004 rulings of the Court requiring them to implement the 2001 Copyright Directive, which provides anti-circumvention protection. If they continue to flout the ECJ’s ruling, the Commission will first issue a reasoned opinion and they ask the ECJ to levy fines on the countries.

A real headache for lending right ...

The IPKat is glad to see the Commission effectively discharging its duty to ensure that EU legislation is properly and equally implemented throughout the EU.

The public lending right in the UK here
How to avoid the public lending right here
Something you’ll want to take out of the library here
COMMISSION BRINGS COPYRIGHT ACTIONS AGAINST FIVE MEMBER STATES COMMISSION BRINGS COPYRIGHT ACTIONS AGAINST FIVE MEMBER STATES Reviewed by Anonymous on Tuesday, March 22, 2005 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.